Russ Dove

Please trade off as I to need all the info you care to send me.

Here,Abatement IS one of the best I have ran accross lately and if I

a resend, please forgive for takweing up your space.

Abatement of Judicial Process .

In regard to questions of law, jurisdiction, venue, and other issues,
most Americans are ignorant of what is going on.

The ignorance (not stupidity) makes the people slaves to the courts,
government process, and court procedures which makes it easy for
governments to gain convictions, impose jail sentences, and levy enormous
fines.

Do you know of any Agencies of the Federal, State, County/Borough, or
City governments that has ever revealed:

*

Applications for Driver's Licenses, Registration, License Plates,
business licenses, etc., are nothing more that "unconscionable contracts"
that subject the people to "foreign courts" under "Emergency Powers" that
amount to "Martial Rule?"

*

That signing such applications is purely voluntary! You have the right to
do these normal activities WITHOUT such applications?

*

That such applications are for "benefits," privileges," and
"opportunities," that justify denial of Constitutional Protected Rights
that we were born with?

*

That the people cannot acquire true or "allodial title" to any property
purchased with such applications?

*

That when one hires an "attorney-at-law," the hireing of that attorney
automatically denies the individual to the procedures that can protect
his/her freedoms?

The answer, of course, is NO!

The reason the people were never told - openly - is because the Federal,
State, County/Borough, and City governents would lose billions of dollars
in revenue. After all, were we not told that "ignorance of the law is no
excuse!"

We are not saying that we are the victims of a great conspiracy because
all anyone needs to know about this legalistic fraud is found in the
public record (if you know were to look). In short, it is not hidden
under a rock somewhere.

Americans are ignorant of what the law and lawful procedure is and this
ignorance has cost the people their very lives, liberty, and property on
a scale never seen before in the United States of America.

The solution is obvious! Teach the people the real law, the lawful
process, and procedures in such a manner that they can defend themselves
"in-law."

If the people was to learn the basics, the emergency powers, and the
government of martial rule; the profits would disappear and these
governments would be forced to return to the common law and the
Constitution.

We begin with "Abatements as a Public Nuisance" for a variety of reasons,
namely:

*

Abatements respond to the majority of the emergency powers paperwork of
the government.

*

Abatements are simple to understand.

*

Abatements have the power and effect of an "Indictment" and/or the filing
of a case or suit.

*

Abatements that go unanswered, (with a "Default" filed) are
"res-judicata." In otherwords, the "Default" is final judgment. The issue
cannot be re-tried without violating Article
V of the Bill of Rights to
the U.S. Constitution.

*

To the best of our knowledge, every Abatement that was properly filed has
succeeded in stopping all martial-rule government processes.

*

Abatements are very low in cost for those who can file their own
paperwork. The costs very seldom exceed the fees of the Processor Server.

*

Abatements that are properly filed are "Public Records" of unlawful acts
by governments and they can be used to prosecute such entities if and
when lawful governments of the people are restored.

*

To understand why abatements work, we must examine the general nature of
Emergency Powers:/1

*

the martial law, and

*

NOTE: The term: "emergency powers" is generic, as used herein. It means
any form of military style government (i.e., "martial law" or "martial
rule"). Martial law and martial rule are not the same. FIRST: Nations
declare "emergency powers" under the "Doctrine of Necessity" when a
calamity occurs (e.g. wars, riots, rebellion, national collapse, etc.)
that cannot be dealt with in a normal, peaceful manner. This has been the
normal manner of dealing with these emergency situations for the last
hundred years. Emergency powers are supposed to be only a TEMPORARY
measure to deal with a crises. When the crises ends, the emergency powers
are suppose to end.

In the United States of America, emergency powers were declared by
Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 to be used in the Bank crisis
that was in progress when he came into Presicency.

In fact, the crisis was a figment of the bankers' imagination; but it
suited Roosevelt's plan to seize and maintain control of the
nation by "Executive Order."

The Congress "rubber-stamped" Roosevelt's E.O's and the
federal power grab was on. From that day (March 9, 1933) to the present,
America has been under a state of National Emergency and the people have
been systematically exploited by every President since. The Congress
works to maintain and justify the enormous growth in the power structure
of the federal government.

The states of this Nation co-operate with the federal government because
they also benefit from a massive increase in their tax revenues and
powers. SECOND: The area over which "emergency powers" may be declared
can cover a part of a state (city or county); several states, or an
entire nation as is the case today. THIRD: The single most dominant
feature of all emergency powers government(s) is UNLAWFUL civil
authority. Civil courts cease to exist and they are replaced by "Courts
of Summary Judgement" with the appearance of legitimacy but without
substance. /3

The Court's process and procedures are a mix of rules from previous
lawful courts and military courts. Traffic Courts, for example, are
"Courts of Summary Judgment" that are using "military rules" as applied
to civilians.

An example of this is seen when defining "traffic infractions."
"Infractions" are not defined in most state Codes, but is defined in "The
Manual of Courts Martial" (1994) /4 along with the terms of "contempt,"
"appeal," etc., and in other military sources. This, by itself, should
tell us all something. FOURTH: Emergency powers government(s) vary in the
degree of the emergency declared. The most extreme is called "Martial
Law." The benign, less restrictive form is "Martial Rule." Currently, the
United States is under the less restrictive form called "Martial Rule."

"Martial law" puts all major resources in an emergency powers area (i.e.,
transportation, food, minerals, metals, communications) under the direct
control of the Nation's Armed Forces and its Commander-in-Chief, the
President of the United States.

In its raw sense; "martial law" governs via "democracy," not a
"republic." "Military law" uses "municipal law." Courts are draped with
quasi-civil (republican) forms of law, evidenced by draped Military
Standards in Court rooms (i.e., the gold-fringed flag of the United
States mounted on a pole).

Is there an armed occupation of America? The answer is: YES.

Under the guise of national emergencies (hurricanes, floods, earthquakes,
etc.); all National Guard units were "federalized" and all policemen,
firemen, highway patrol, state marshals, and county sheriffs were placed
under control of the Guard since 1972. They are all under the control of
the "Federal Emergency Management Administration" (F.E.M.A.) who is the
cover for the centralization of military and law enforcement powers under
the Federal government and the Commander-in-Chief, the President of the
United States.

Though the law enforcement officers may not know it; they are a force
occupying the land for the Federal government. We, the people, are held
hostage by our own neighbors.

The reason why "Active Duty" federal forces are stationed in all National
Guard Armories is obvious. They are there to sustain the emergency powers
control of the states and counties by the federal government and to
maintain "martial rule" in the hands of the President as
Commander-in-Chief.

By these means, the federal martial rule government maintains "open,
notorious, and hostile, armed occupation of the land." SECOND: Military
law only recognizes "municipal law." So the states had to create
Municipal Courts to punisth "infractions" of Motor Vehicle Codes. Such
courts fly the FLAG of the Commander-in-Chief, (gold fringed Flag) and
they are realy an arm, or extension of the power of the President. Their
primary function is to collect "war reparations" through "fines,"
"penalties," etc.. They all operate as "quasi-military" courts using
summary court martial proceedings.

This is why such Courts only try "matters of fact" and why Judges make
and declare law on a case by case basis without the controls of precedent
or constitutional restrictions. Municipal Court Judges do this because
they act for the Commander-in-Chief (in the field) under emergency
conditions. Judges make decisions to resolve the case under "Doctrines of
Necessity." In such courts; the Constitution, Supreme Court Decisions,
and Civil Stare Decises, are not permitted.

Under emergency powers, the final authority is always with the Chief
Military Commander (which in this Nation is the Commander-in-Chief,
[i.e., the military office of the President of the United States]).

This accounts for the "Executive Order" snow storms since Franklin
D. Roosevelt (who openly declared of his seizure of Emergency
Powers in March, 1933 [via Executive Orders]).

"Executive Orders" have the force and effect of law when they are
published in the Federal Register (and by this means they become: "Public
Policy"). THIRD: Under emergency powers, there is no lawful civil or
constitutional authority and there are no LAWFUL Civil Courts. And
without Civil Courts, there can be no lawful civil or administrative
process. This is the key to understanding why "Abatements" work.

All emergency power process MUST BE DEFECTIVE in form, content, and
authority when such process is compared to lawful process. And as
defective as it is, IT IS VALID IN ALL CASES EXCEPT WHEN ABATED.

There are many who believe that special appearances (by paperwork,
motions, etc.,) nullify a Court's jurisdiction. Under emergency powers,
this is a false doctrine.

There are no remedies in challenging a Court's jurisdiction except by
abating its process. FIRST: "Abatements" are not a challenge to a court's
jurisdiction, they are merely a "good faith" attempt to correct errors in
process (i.e., "clear up the errors, judge, and I will appear").

"Special Appearances" fail when a Judge knows what he is doing. Under
"Martial Rule," Judges do whatever they want, whenever they want, so long
as he does not alarm the public or disturb the peace.

Jurisdiction is always granted to try jurisdictional questions, even if
one goes to higher Courts. Defendants grant jurisdiction without knowing
it, because they never challenge the process that creates the
jurisdiction. "Process" is perfected by "appearance," special or
otherwise.

Also the Court is not the building nor is it the Judge or anyone else. It
is the paperwork. If the Court's paperwork is defective, there is no
Court and it ceases to exist.

By necessity, field Officers (Judges, Highway Patrol, State Troopers,
Sheriffs, etc.) exercise powers of life and death to maintain authority
given to them by International Law that prohibits lawful civil authority
or constitutional mandates because such procedures are too timely and
clumsy for military, quasi-military, operations. Constitutional and
Commom Law precendents are to restrictive of Federal, State,
Count/Borough and City powers.

Military Courts exercise "benefit of discussion" /6 that gives a Court
jurisdiction as soon as a Demandant answers a question or demands any
response or action of a Military Court. SECOND: "Arrest Warrents" and
Procedures do not conform to Constitutional Law because they don't have
to if a Defendant appears in person or by "special appearance" paperwork.

"Arrest Warrents" with a Judge's signature (black ink) and proper
Affidavits with true Court seals, are instruments of lawful process and
cannot be used in emergency powers courts. THIRD: Federal, State, County,
and City emergency powers Courts (and other entities) manipulate the
English grammar to protect their own International Law status. Thus, a
state either writes its name as "The State of Alaska" (instead of "Alaska
State") or in caps (instead of proper upper and lower case letters), or
they use abbrevations such as CA, AK, TX, MT, KS, and so on, ad nauseum,
all of which are "misnomers" and are not names at all. Also,
International Law requires that neither party to a case (the State and
the person) can appear in their own name, but only under the nom de
guerre (war name), as indicated by a name in all caps or one name with an
abbreviation.

Be reminded that Emergency Powers Courts have no lawful process because
they have no lawful authority. All Process by such Courts is therefore
"defective" because the Courts are forbidden to use lawful Process unless
and until it is voluntarily given to them.

The real irony is that the Federal Government (in cooperation with the
States) have created "Emergency Powers Courts" to expand their power and
increase revenue. But by doing so, they have become vulnerable to lawful
Process.

Furthermore, there is very little that they can do about it now without
coming directly into conflict with International Law. This is why the
United States government will never pull out of the United Nations
because the United Nations is the source of authority for the the United
States to protect itself under International Law.

A WORD OF CAUTION: One who hires an Attorney-At-Law cannot bring a lawful
Process against an Emergency Powers Court because Attorneys are Agents of
the Court (Officers of the Court) and they only use the Process allowed
by the Court (that licensed the Attorney to practice before that Court).
/7 All "Bar Members" are Agents of Emergency Powers Courts. You must,
therefore, never hire an Attorney to appear on a case in an Emergency
Powers Court. Doing so makes one "non compos mentis" (i.e., not mentally
competent) and automatically gives the Court jurisdiction over one's
self. /8

"Arrest Warrants" (with a signature of a Judge [black ink] that is
supported with proper "Affidavits" and "Court Seals") are lawful
Processes and they cannot be used within Emergency Powers Courts. That is
why such "Warrents" are never proper.

What about the Constitution of the United States of America in all this?
Basically (without lawful Process or authority), the Constitution is a
dead letter, a facade, that is manipulated at the Federal government's
whim because lawful Process, itself, is based upon the Constitution and
thus the Process is inter-dependent.

Abraham Lincoln set the presedence for the subversion of the
Constitution during the War between the States in 1860. /9 The Federal
government's use of the Constitution came down to this: If the
Constitutional fits a federal need, it is used. If the Constitution
doesn't fit, it is ignored. /10

This is why so many U.S. Supreme Court decisions (e.g. "Right to Privacy"
cases, "Abortion Rights, Social Security, etc. [for which there are no
Constitutional precedents]) are made. A "social agenda" is impossible
without "Doctrines of Necessity" and "International Law" to justify the
impostion of Emergency Powers as a first priority.

Keep in mind that there is no "Federal Social Security" before the
passage of the "Internation Labor Organizations Treaty" of 1935. This
"Treaty" mandated a social consciousness and enfranchisement of the
masses. This process ended in the massive entitlements programs that the
people are burdened with today.

The hidden Constitutional problem for Americans under Emergency Powers is
that all Constitutional Rights become "privileges" that can be given or
taken away at whim, by necessity and International law. Do you recall
Mark Furman replying to all questions in regard to the infamous slander
tapes in California v. Simpson? Did he not
declare that: "I wish to assert my Fifth Amendment "PREVILEGE." Mr.
Furman did not assert a "RIGHT" - only a PRIVILEGE, using the words given
to him by his attorney/agent of an emergency powers Court.

"Privileges" (being removable at a Commander-in-Chiefs' whim), tells us
why the Congress feels so free to modify Constitutional Rights, (such as
those in the 2nd Amendment [i.e., "gun ownership," etc.]).

The remaining question is: "How are Emergency Powers and Martial Law, (or
Martial Rule) terminated?" FIRST: A Commander-in-Chief can terminate
emergencies by Executive Orders (E.O.'s). Upon such an Order, the
emergency ends on a specific date and time. But a lawful civil authority
must exist (United Nations?) to which he may cede authority. SECOND: If
one is conquered by another, the conquering power can terminate Emergency
Powers by its own Executive Orders or decrees. This point deserves some
expanded discussion for reason which will becom clear in a minute. We
must remember that the United States is, by International Law and Supreme
Court decisions, "a foreign principal" with respect to the states of the
Union. Furthermore; under "Title II" of the "United States Code," THE
CONGRESS is not POSITIVE LAW, only a Resolution. /11 This means that this
"USC Title" stands only until it is successfully challenged in the
Courts. Why is this? Did not the Congress abandon without proper recess,
its first Session during Lincoln's administration in 1860? Does this not
tell us why the United States flag flies over all state flags since
Franklin D. Roosevelt's "Excutive Order" changed the
"Trading with the Enemy Act" of 1917. THIRD: The emergency can be
terminated by the people IF they restore lawful Civil
Courts, Processes, and Procedures. And under the authority of "inherent
political powers," re-establish proper civil and "de jure" government.
ABATEMENTS are a primary tool in achieving a peaceful and lawful
restoration of Godly authority to this Nation. By now, you, the Reader,
can see why "Abatements" are one of the most important tools the people
have. If the people lawfully resist any submission to Emergency Powers
Courts, Process, Procedure, and the unlawful paperwork that are responded
to by lawful Process, would be nullified - ab initio, nunc pro tunc.

If the people were to restore lawful Process and Procedure, how would
they restore lawful authority in the Courts? The answer is by re-forming
lawful jural societies and use the remedies provided in the Bible
(Christianity, Common Law, and Assize Courts/Juries, in conjunction with
the Grand Jury), where necessary.

On the subject of Christianity; we cannot forget that it is STILL law and
adopted as such by many states. In the Old Testament we find not just our
moral law, but Godly rules of restitution as well. The Holy Bible is the
standard of law on which the Common Law is based.

The Federal, State, County/Borough, and City governments WILL NOT assist
the people in restoring Common Law and the Constitution because it is not
in their interest to do so. Why? Because the entire system of welfare,
income taxes, the codes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and bureaucracy,
would cease to exist in very short order - within the states.

The technical form of an "Abatement" is basically the same as any other
Process Form.

*

At the top of the Form is the "Location" as to where the Defendant is to
send his/her reply to the Demandant's Abatement.

*

Next is the "Heading" that states the name of the Court and its location.

*

Below the Heading and to the left side of the page is the "Place" where
we state the "name" and "status" of the parties to the action (Demandant
and Defendant).

*

Below the Heading and to the right side of the page is where we state the
"case number" and the "type of action" (e.g. Non-statutory Abatement).

*

Following the sub-headings (3 & 4 above) is the "main body" that states
the "law and maxims" that justify issuance of the action (In this case,
it is an "Abatement").

In a typical Traffic Citation Abatement, the Demandant's Abatement Form
may look like this:

----------------

Respond to: Christian Name

General Delivery

----------------

Notice the above Form:

*

The Abatement filer is "Demandant" and the person to whom the Abatement
is sent is called the "Defendant."

*

The use of the term: "against" instead of "versus."

*

The lower case spelling of the name "superior court."

*

The Defendant and Defendant's "address" is spelled out in all upper case
letters.

*

The Demandant's "location" is to "General Delivery."

*

The designation "Part One" is in the Common Law venue.

In the "Heading" of the Abatements there is a correct way and a wrong way
to spell the name of the Court in which the Abatement is filed. There is
a correct and wrong way to spell every name on any piece of paperwork
issued to or received from a Court or any other government entity as the
"Rules of English Grammer", make clear.

THESE PURELY TECHNICAL POINTS MUST NOT BE IGNORED. They mean the
difference between the "success" or "failure" of the Process. In English
Grammer, capitalizing the first letter of a noun makes it a "proper noun"
denoting a specific individual, place, or thing. In law, capitalizing
means that the Process was sent to a SPECIFIC place or thing (type) of
Court. The same name (uncapitalized) is a different Court of General
Jurisdiction or Common Law.

The spelling of a Demandant's or Defendant's name also makes a difference
in who the Demandant or Defendant is. One whose name is spelled in all
"caps" is a 14th Amendment "person." One whose name is spelled as a
proper noun is not a person, but is a "Christian." The spelling
determines whether the parties are "real" or "fictitious."

If the Demandant's and/or Defedant's name is spelled in all upper case
letters, the spelling fails to conform to English Grammer Rules, but
still has specific meaning in Emergency Powers Courts.

Any name that is typed in all upper case letters is a "nom de guerre," or
"war name" that is evidenced of who and what the Court or person really
is. ONLY COURTS UNDER EMERGENCY POWERS USE ALL UPPER CASE LETTERS TO
SPELL NAMES. Emergency Powers Courts cannot use lawful grammer rules
because they are used only in lawful Process. ALL DOCUMENTS CREATED BY
EMERGENCY POWERS SPELL THE NAMES OF ALL PERSONS, CORPORATIONS, OR OTHER
ENTITIES (including Addresses at times) IN ALL UPPER CASE LETTERS.

To prove this, check your Driver's License, Social Security Card, Union
Card, Credit and Insurance Cards, etc., and see how often your name
appears in upper case letters (or abbreviations to your name). If you
find a card that does not spell your name in upper case letters, it is
because the card is either old or the issuing entity is ignorant. It may
be also that the entity does no "trade or business" nor accepts a
benefit, privilege, or opportunity from emergency powers.

The first item in the "Body" of the Abatement Form is the "statement of
correction of spelling of Demandant's name." The Demandant must state
his/her full, true Christian name in proper English grammer (upper and
lower case letters). THE DEMANDANT MUST SPECIFICALLY DENY THAT A NAME
APPEARING IN ALL UPPER CASE LETTERS IS DEMANDANT'S NAME. You must
remember that no man can be LAWFULLY sued in any but his properly
spelled, full Christian name (first and middle name). Use the word:
"Christian" to describe your name because this is how the Common Law
describes it.

In regard to Abatements filed against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
the IRS has responded to the spelling argument and "re-issued" the
paperwork with a change in the spelling of Demandant's name by spelling
it with upper and lower case letters, but it is never a true Christian
name because they always changed one name to an abbrevation. The Common
Law says: "an initial is no part of a name and is defined as a
"misnomer."" /12

Christians cannot have two names, i.e. a Christian name and a nom de
guerre. We are baptized in one name that includes a first and second
name. Emergency Powers gave us a second name that "slanders" our
Christian name. No man can be prosecuted without giving consent to
Process from an Emergency Powers Court.

Your full Christian name may be: John Kenneth Doe, but the IRS will
always submit their paperwork with J. Kenneth Doe, or J.K. Doe, or John
K. Doe, or JOHN KENNETH DOE, none of which are a lawful Christian name.
By responding with another Abatement that notes the error, the IRS has no
choice but to go away. The point is - all emergency powers entities know
what they are doing and why.

One may see a phrase similar to the following in Emergency
Powers Process:

"You must appear at ......"

At first glance, this sentence appears to demand a Court
appearance in person, but in law, "must" means "may." What is really
being said is:

"We invite you to appear ......"

The bottom line is that your physical appearance is voluntary, not
compulsory. But if you fail to answer the Process, voluntary or not, a
new Process comes back and this time the wording will be "mandatory."
This Process is issued because you had opportunity, time, place, and a
date to respond and you didn't. YOU ARE NOW IN DEFAULT OF PROCESS. By not
answering concedes jurisdiction over you to the Emergency Powers Court.

You had time, place, notice, and opportunity. Your failure to do so made
you vulnerable. Now, you will be compelled by "Warrent of Physical
Arrest" at the emergency powers convenience to appear. Of course, the
Arrest Warrant (and subsequent process) will be just as defective as the
first, but because you didn't respond, the government knows that you have
no lawful process and are thus "defenseless." The emergency powers
government can feel safe to proceed against you even with faulty Process.
And remember - if you are in jail, it is tough to write good Process
because you will then be considered a "prisoner of war" and denied all
the normal assistance the volunteers get.

Emergency powers entities often write their first Process in the form of
a letter that is steeped in codes, ordinances, rules, and regulations.
The average man normally responds to the letter with a letter that
doesn't challenge their Process as in an "Abatement."

All Abatements discussed herein are "Non-Statutory." This means that they
do not depend upon an de facto government statute, code, authority,
ordinance, rule, or regulation, to give them lawful effect.

Specific statements in Abatements apply only to the specific Emergency
Powers who have sent papers to a potential Defendant. You would use
statements in IRS Abatements that you would not use in Traffic Court or
State entity Abatements.

The following specifics may be used in almost any Abatement with the
appropriate modifications to account for the entity you are dealing with.

*

"Your items are refused for cause without dishonor and without recourse
to me and returned herewith because they are irregular, unauthorized,
incomplete, and void process."

*

"All documents were received but not accepted."

*

"Your agents are imposing provisions of a contract counter to public
morals."

*

"your paperwork has failed to affirmatively show your entry upon my
privacy."

*

"Your paperwork alleges violations of law foreign to my venue, which no
oath, promise, or law, attaches me thereto."

*

"Your office is not established in the (whatever State) Constitution.

*

"Your paperwork has no foundation in law for the reason that they are not
from an office recognized by the people or general laws of (whatever
State).

*

"Your paperwork has no warrent in law and are not judicial in nature."

*

"Your paperwork is not sealed by the recognized authority of the
(whatever State)."

*

"Your paperwork is incomplete and defective upon its face due to
insufficient law."

*

What follows are specific statements to be made to the Internal Revenue
Service.

*

The IRS employees are not state judicial officers having power to issue
Orders or Judgments of any kind.

*

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS ONLY APPLY TO CALIFORNIA.
For you to use the following examples in another State, the citations
must be researched and changed to reflect the subject State's law.

*

"Whereas, pursuant to the due process requirements of the Constitution
and of the Statutes of 1927, Chapter 752, Section 40, appearance for
violations of provisions of Motor Vehicle Act of 1913, as amended, are to
be before a magistrate in the township wherein the alleged offense
occurred, or before any magistrate in the county, if there is a municipal
Court at the county seat. Therefore, said citation is mis-processed in
said Municipal Court."

*

"Whereas Municipal Court employees are NOT state judicial
officers according to the Penal Code of California, approved Fedruary 14,
1872, part 2, Title III, Chapter 3, Sections 807, 808, the municipal
courts judges are not magistrates having power to issue a warrant for the
arrest of a person charged with a public offense.

*

"Whereas the "Warrant of Arrest Notice" concering an unlawfrul warrant,
imposes upon my privacy, and

*

"Whereas my privacy is a constitutionally secured right; therefore,

*

"Said "Warrant of Arrest Notice" is harassment and a public nuisance.

*

"Whereas the Plaintiff has used forms of money inimical to public welfare
according to the standards set by the California Constitution of 1849,
Article 4, Section 34, and;

*

"Therefore, the contract for bail is contra bonos mores..

*

"All the foregoing I stand ready to verify."

*

"Whereas pursuant to the Political Code of the State of California,
approved March 12, 1872, Part I, Title III, Section 54, mentioned
municipal courts, subject to the jurisdiction of this state, and

*

"Whereas the citiation is deemed irregular and unauthorized, and"

*

The first item listed and seen on the non-statutory Abatement below the
sections discussed above, is simply styled as follows:

----------------

By John Kenneth, (Doe), Sui Juris:

In the matter of: CITATION NO. 1318910.

To All And Sundry Whom These Presents Do Or May Concern:

----------------

The format for the introduction in a non-statutory Abatement is normally
patterned after the following:

----------------

This is a nonstatutory Abatement issued pursuant to Common Law rules
applicable to such cases, against a municipal court, located at 21201
Victory Blvd., Suite 120, Canoga park, Los Angeles county, California;
because, said municipal court is imposing provisions of a contract
counter to public morals.

Part one of this matter shall be known as the Non-statutory Abatement and
contains the following documents titled:

*

Non-statutory Abatement, and,

*

Verification.

----------------

Notice that we styled the court location in numbers and words as is
commonly done in emergency powers designations because that is the
designation at which THEY accept mail.

"Chapter One" of an Abatement has its own "Title" and begins with an
inventory of papers returned to the Court, and a short statement telling
why the papers are being returned. Next, we state the reasons why a
Court's Process is defective. It looks something like the following:

----------------

Please find enclosed the following mailed items: One:
WARRENT OF ARREST NOTICE, and, Two: CITATION (number
1318919).

These items are refused for cause without dishonor and are being
returned, herewith, because they are irregular and unauthorized, based
upon the following, to wit:

----------------

By now you have probably filled up "Page One" of the Abatement and where
you would put the page number at the bottom, center of the page you would
type "Page One of (total pages in Abatement)". This page may look like
the following:

----------------

Whereas, pursuant to constitutional due process requirements and Statutes
1927, Chapter 752, Section 40, appearances for violations of provisions
of the Motor Vehicle Act of 1913, as amended, are to be before a
magistrate in the township wherein the alleged offense occurred, or
before any magistrate in the county, if there is a municipal court at the
county seat.

Therefore, said CITATION NO. 1318919 is mis-processed into
said municipal court; and,

----------------

Here is where the next errors by the court are written down, or one may
list several errors all properly separated as follows under the
"Secondly," "Thirdly," "Fourthly," "Fifthly," type of headings:

----------------

Whereas, municipal court employees are not State Judicial Officers and
according to THE PENAL CODE OF CALIFORNIA, approved February 14th, 1872,
Part II, Title III, Chapter III, Sections 807 and 808, the municipal
court judges are not magistrates having power to issue a warrant for
arrest of a person charged with a public offense, and;

Whereas said WARRANT OF ARREST NOTICE concerning an unlawful
warrant imposes upon my privacy, and;

Whereas my privacy is a constitutionally secured right,

Therefore, said WARRANT OF ARREST NOTICE is harassment and a
public nuisance, and;

Whereas, the Plaintiff has used a form of money inimical to public
welfare according to the standard set by the California Constitution of
1849, Article IV, Section 34,

Therefore, the "Contract for Bail" is contra bonos mores.

All of the foregoing I stand ready to verify.

----------------

Chapter One is now complete and we begin "Chapter Two," a simple
discussion of issues, and it may appear as follows:

----------------

Whereas, pursuant to THE POLITICAL CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, approved March 12, 1872, Part I, Title III, Section
54, mentioned municipal court is a person subject to the jurisdiction of
this state; and,

Whereas, the CITATION NO. 1318919 is deemed irregular and
unauthorized; and,

Whereas, there appears to be no factors which would warrant adjustment of
the Abatement.

----------------

"Ordering Clauses" are vital to an Abatement's success because, without
it, you cannot get "Default Judgment," and with no "Default Judgment,"
there is NO "Res Judicata." The clause appearing below is for a
California traffic case. You must research your own state laws to
determine the specifics of which law applies.

----------------

Whereas, pursuant to THE POLITICAL CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, approved March 11th, 1872, Part II, Title XIV, Chapter
I, Section 1003; wherein it does say, that: "Every direction of a court
or judge, made or entered in writing, and not included in a judgment, is
denominated an order."

Said municipal court shall abate the matter of: CITATION No.
1318919 or file a written response, within thirty (30) days of the
release of this Non-statutory Abatement, showing why the Abatement should
not be imposed. Any written response must include a detailed factual
statement and supporting documentation.

Failure to answer this Non-statutory Abatement within the time
prescribed, herein, will result in a "Default" and "Default Judgment" and
subject Defendants to civil and/or criminal liabilities, pursuant to
International law and the Law of Nations.

Your remittance should be marked with the Sheriffs' case number, and
mailed to the following location:

[Your full Christian name]

General Delivery,

[City name], [full name of your state]

----------------

NOTE: You must use "General Delivery" as your location (not address)
because that location is where YOUR court is. Your court is everywhere in
general and nowhere in specific. Addresses are specific and a benefit.
"Privilege," or "opportunity" are words that you want to avoid using. The
best practice is to use "General Delivery" in all dealings with emergency
powers governments and their entities.

The "Verification" is simple in its form. A "Verification" is a statement
of affirmation that you have read and know the contents of the Abatement
and that you believe the statements to be true. A "Verification" is typed
on a separate page and it is the last page in the Abatement before the
"Proof of Service" of Process. A typical verification page is as follows:

----------------

Respond to: [Your Christian Name], Sui Juris,

General Delivery,

[Your City], [Your state spelled out]

----------------

Remember to spell out all dates. For example, "the twenty-second day of
the tenth month." Never use calendar names as the names of months. Thus,
"January" is written as the "First month," and so on.

The Abatement is now complete and ready to serve upon an emergency powers
entity. But the "Service of Process" is conducted according to specific
rules, so pay attention to the following.

To get the process served, do the following steps:

*

Make two copies of the Non-statutory Abatement paperwork. NOTE: Outside
California, the name of the court you file process in may be different.
In Texas and Oklahoma, for example, there are county district courts
which are the same as Superior Courts in California.

*

After finalizing the document, take it to the CIVIL division of the
Sheriffs' Department and request an instruction sheet for process of
service. DO NOT ASK FOR A CASE NUMBER.

Allow the Clerk to process the Abatement and when asked for a case
number, tell them there is no case number yet. If you let them, they will
assign a case number for you to your Abatement.

*

Once you have a case number, write it in the blank you left on Page One
of the Abatement (and on all copies you have made).

*

Fill out the instruction sheet directing the Sheriff to whom, and where,
and what time the Respondent(s) may be served. The costs of having a
Sheriffs' Deputy to do "Service of Process" for you varies from state to
state. In California, the cost is Twenty-Five Dollars.

If the Sheriffs' Office refuses to serve Process for you, you may remind
the staff of the Sheriff that the Sheriff also "possess a Judicial
capacity, and may hold a court and summon a jury for certain purposes;
this jurisdiction, in this respect, is at common law quite extensive.
This branch of his powers, however, is circumscribed in this country by
the statutes of the several states, and is generally confined to the
execution of writs of inquiry of damages, and the like (e.g Abatements),
sent to him from the superior courts (your court) of law." [Bouvier's Law
Dictionary "Sheriff"; 1 Sharswood, Blackstone, Comm, 389].

*

Wait thirty (30) days before you have your "Default" processed. Serve the
"Default" in the same manner as above (Remember - the thirty days does
not include Sundays or Holidays.)

*

A problem that Demandants are having, occasionally, is that some states
(e.g. Alaska) doesn't have Sheriffs or the Sheriff will not serve their
Abatement. If this is the case with you, send your Abatement via
Registered Mail. Before placing your Abatement in the envelope, pay 55
cents to the Postal Clerk for a machine generated adhesive Stamp (the
same type that are used for sending packages). Have the Postal Clerk
place it in the upper right hand corner on the first page of your
Abatement and then have the Postal Clerk "date stamp" across the Stamp.
Use the Registered Mail number as your case number and write it in the
space that you provided for it. You can also bring conformed copies with
you and do the same process with those for your records or for hand
delivered copies to other parties in cases where time is of the essence.

When mailing your Process, always insert an "Certificate of Mailing" that
states the name of the individual, who is of age to be a witness, that is
mailing the Process for you. UNDER COMMON LAW, YOU CANNOT MAIL YOUR OWN
PROCESS. The "Certificate of Mailing" is your "Proof of Process" which
also describes the contents of the Process (Complaint, Summons, Exhibits,
etc.).

All "Defaults" should be sent in this manner (Registered), and when the
Abatement was assigned a Sheriffs' case number, continue to use that
Sheriffs' number on the Default.

Always remember to write across all returned papers: "refused for
cause without dishonor and without recourse to me." Never quote
the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) on this and never inject
into your Abatement any Court Case Cites or Statutory Code Cites. Code
Cites that are to be used have to come from "Common Law Codes" that were
created before your State was incorporated, (which would be sometime
previous to 1880). Other than Common Law Code cites of your State, you
should not change the text and form of a typical Abatement. Never write
about facts of the case and never quote any law but Common Law. Never
file an Abatement into a statutory Court. If you do any of these
"nevers," you will sham your court and make the Abatement
null and void.

If you cannot find a corresponding "Ordering Clause" in your State Common
Law Codes, use the same quoted clause from the California Code, but begin
it with: "Pursuant to The Constitution of the united States of America at
Article IV, Section one and Section two, Clause one, the following
American Maxim of Law is binding in all of the states of the American
Union; wherein it does say, that: "Every direction ... etc.""

Occasionally, problems arise for some users of the abatement process due
to a lack of understanding of the critical balance between statutory and
non-statutory process or the disregard of time proven explanations.

*

Always use "General Delivery" as your return location for
answers from the Defendants. The reasons being:

*

"General Delivery" is the only Common Law venue remaining in
the postal system.

*

A home address or P.O. Box is located in a statutorily created commercial
venue under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).

*

"General Delivery" is a "Traditionally Vested Right" that
was established from the beginning of the Post Office Department and is
the only part of the Post Office Department that remains today.

*

"General Delivery" is where your own personal court is
located; everywhere in General and nowhere in specific. (see Black's Law
Dictionary, all editions; "COURT" `In International Law';
"The person and suite of the sovereign; the place where the sovereign
sojourns with his regal retinue. wherever that may be.").

In America. the people are king, as in; "Every man's home is his Castle."
There will be one Main Post Office in your town that receives "General
Delivery." In some cases, you may have to apply for it or they will
return your mail to the sender. If application is nessesary, fill in that
the reason you want "General Delivery" is because you have a "transient
lifestyle." The meaning of' "transient" is the opposite of "resident." In
the Post Office Manual, General Delivery is for "transients" only.
"Transient" means "sojourner." "Resident" is short for "Resident Alien
Enemy". After General Delivery is establised, remove the mail box from
your house or cancel your P.O. Box. This is a must, as it removes you
from that statutorily created commercial venue.

*

Always use as your court below for your return location, ...superior
court, --- county, Utah, Ohio, etc., (your state). Always use a small (s)
on superior and small (c) on court. It doesn't matter if there is no
superior court in your county, for this caption does not refer to their
court, but indicates your court, which is superior to all others. Never
use county of ---, always --- county, and always use a small (c) on
county.

*

If the county Sheriff will not serve and the Post Office Clerk will not
date stamp your Abatement, put the upper portion of the first page of the
Abatement (from the top to Chapter One) in the Public Notice section of
the newspaper in the county where the Abatement is to be served. Use the
Public Notice number as your case number. On all three types of service,
always hand deliver a complimentary copy to all Defendant parties. Hand
delivered copies are always to be done by a friend or one not connected
with the suit.

*

Always refer to the refused items as "returned papers" or "items." Do
not call them "documents," as they are not worthy of that title. Always
capitalize "Me," "My," "Myself," "Right," "Private" and "Privacy."

*

The following are sample Abatements:

*

The Basic Abatement

This is the basic form of an Abatement. It can be used as a
format for most non-statutory Abatements.

*

Abatement of IRS Summons enforcement

This is a sample Abatement that may be used to abate a "Court
Ordered" enforcement of an IRS Summons.

*

Abatement of IRS Liens and Levies

This is sample Abatement that may be used to abate IRS Liens and
Levies.

1.See, "Senate Report on Emergency powers," No 93-574, the most
comprehensive work to date on the real power of the President and
Congress, and also admits openly that the Federal government is under
emergency powers and has been so since F.D.R..

2.See, Birkheimer, "Military Government and Martial Rule," 1914, (770
pages). The research team that put this book together searched through 42
Titles on the questions of military, government, martial law, and martial
rule and recommends this work as the best to date.

3.See Black's Law Dict., 3rd edition, on "government, de facto."

4.The Manual of Courts Martial (1994) is actually a sample update of the
1985 version and is available from most Federal book stores and the U.S.
Government Printing Office the last time we checked.

5.See the various Manuals of Colors of the U.S. Armed Forces.

6.See Corpus Juris Secumdum, vol. 7. Secs. 4 & 7, "attorney client
privilege."

7.See, Blacks Law Dict., 3rd ed, "ward of the court."

8.See, Blacks Law Dict., 3rd ed., "discussion."

9.See Lincoln's Executive Order No. 1, April 21, 1861

10.See Title 28, US Code, Sec. 453.

11.See, Table of Contents, Vol. I, U.S. Titles and Codes. There is an
asterisk (*) next to Title II, [The Congress]. Checking at the foot of
the page and you will find that all Titles with such an asterisk are
"Resolutions," not "Positive Law," which means, that "Resolutions" are
"Policy" until challenged.